Search for: "In re: Barbara Stone" Results 1 - 20 of 48
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2013, 7:37 am by Joanna Herzik
You can also view Barbara's TexasBar.com profile. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 6:56 am by randal shaheen
Judge Hamilton, for example, repeatedly asked Google’s counsel why her client re-posted Sponsored Listings for alleged counterfeiters after Rosetta Stone asked that they be removed. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 9:23 am
Ewing, 282 A.2d 206 (Pa. 1971), and it only took 44 years to incorporate the rule into standard jury instructions..Remember, these are “suggested” instructions only, so they’re not etched in stone. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
”   According to NPR, the New York Public Library has just made 180,000 high-res images available online. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 3:39 pm by Barbara van Schewick
”   Professor Barbara van Schewick is professor of law at Stanford University and the director of Stanford Law School’s Center for Internet and Society. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 7:11 am by Ben
Arthur and Barbara Sheridan filed two lawsuits in New Jersey federal court: one against Pandora and Sirius XM (PDF) and another against iHeartMedia (PDF), the parent company of online music service iHeartRadio. [read post]
12 Dec 2009, 10:51 am by Jeff Gamso
"You're not going to solve it with my quote. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 11:57 am by Cody M. Poplin
These include re-applying new sanctions that are to be lifted as part of the accord, and potentially passing new terrorism-related sanctions that are not included as part of the broader nuclear deal. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 12:01 pm
This wedding ceremony was presided over by not one, but two divas of the federal judiciary: Judge Barbara S. [read post]
11 May 2021, 10:32 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Students feel that they’re in a very different place than professors; they’re used to different sources. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
While it all meant business as usual for the Taft Court, pesky progressive academics were flexing their muscles in the law reviews during the 1920s by yammering about legal indeterminacy and realism in law; doting on dissents; railing about the Court’s conservatism; becoming a claque for Holmes, Brandeis, and Stone; and, according to some, undercutting respect for the rule of law and the Court’s authority. [read post]